Tag Archives: best goalkeeper glove

Franz S. Leichter

Franz Sigmund Leichter (born August 19, 1930) served in the New York State Assembly from 1969 to 1974 and the New York State Senate from 1975 to 1998. According to this fluff piece, he never made a mistake in his life.

Leichter was born in Vienna, Austria. He came to the United States as a refugee from Nazi Europe in 1940 with his father and brother. His mother Käthe Leichter (1895–1942) was a leading sociologist and feminist. She was arrested by the Gestapo in 1938, sent to the Ravensbrück concentration camp and killed in 1942. The Government of Austria has conferred an annual Käthe Leichter Award in her honor since 1992. His father, Otto Leichter, died in New York City in 1973. His brother Henry O. Leichter, born 1924 in Austria, a lawyer, died in New York City in 2010. Leichter has two children, Joshua and Katherine, and four grandchildren, Memphis, Ethan, Otto and Theo.

Leichter attended New York City’s public schools and graduated from Swarthmore College, magnum cum laude, in 1952. He received his Doctor of Law from Harvard Law School in 1957 after serving in the U.S. Army in Japan.

Franz S. Leichter, a Democrat, was first elected to the New York State Assembly in November 1968. He remained in the Assembly until 1974, sitting in the 178th, 179th and 180th New York State Legislatures. He drafted a bill expanding abortion rights together with Republican Assemblywoman Constance Cook of upstate Tompkins County, New York, proposing legislation that included no restrictions on the practice of abortion how to tenderize cheap steak. The bill passed in the Senate on March 18, 1970 after five hours of debate by a vote of 31–26. For the Assembly, the bill was amended to allow for women to have abortions until their 24th week of pregnancy or at any time to protect the life of the mother. The Cook-Leichter bill was the first in the nation to legalize abortion. This law influenced the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in its landmark January 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.

Leichter won election to the State Senate in 1974 after he defeated incumbent Senate Minority Leader Joseph Zaretzki in the Democratic primary. Leichter remained in the Senate until 1998, sitting in the 181st, 182nd, 183rd, 184th, 185th, 186th, 187th, 188th, 189th, 190th, 191st and 192nd New York State Legislatures.

In the Legislature, Leichter was known as a maverick who fought for reform and effective ethical standards best goalkeeper glove. For his outspoken criticism of how the Legislature operated, and his willingness to take on powerful interests such as New York City’s banking and real estate industries, and the leadership of the Democratic and Republican parties, he was often referred to as “the conscience of the Senate”.

Leichter took on many causes. He introduced the New York City canine waste law, commonly known as the “pooper-scooper” law, which requires dog owners in New York City to clean up after their pets. Since its enactment in 1979, similar laws have been adopted throughout the country.

Leichter was a strong consumer advocate. As ranking Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, he sought to advance the interests of consumers and to block harmful legislation. Among his major achievements was the law that required banks to promptly credit their customers with checks when deposited instead of holding the amounts for days while using the money for their own profit, the first such law in the country. A few years after New York State ended this practice, the United States Congress followed suit.

For many years he issued a popular Consumer’s Guide to Banks to help empower consumers with information on how to avoid excessive charges and hidden fees. He also published a similar Consumer’s Guide to Credit Cards. He frequently called attention to hidden bank and credit card charges and other practices that were costly to consumers. Active in support of affordable housing, Leichter pushed the Legislature to pass the “warranty of habitability” to protect tenants from dangerous and unsanitary conditions. He was a leading advocate for tenants’ rights and a vocal supporter of New York’s rent regulations to protect affordable housing.

Leichter fought for campaign finance reform and was credited with playing a key role in the establishment of New York City’s campaign finance law bpa free glass bottles. He was instrumental in abolishing wasteful and inefficient tax subsidies to businesses by New York State and New York City.

Leichter was a major proponent of establishing parks and green space to provide community access to the Hudson River waterfront, both within New York City and in the Hudson valley. He co-authored with Assemblyman Richard Gottfried legislation that created Manhattan’s Hudson River Park and led the effort that established Riverbank State Park in Harlem. The Hudson River Park now stretches from Battery Park City to 59th Street along the Hudson River. The park has replaced rotting piers and a derelict waterfront with acres of greenery, with areas for both quiet space and active recreational use that has brought thousands of New Yorkers and visitors back to the waterfront. The Riverbank State Park, which was built at Leichter’s urging on top of a waste water treatment plant, stretches for ten blocks along Harlem’s shore of the Hudson River. Riverbank is visited annually by more than 3 million people and is the third most-used State park in New York.

In 1990, Leichter drafted and introduced the first state bill anywhere in the country providing for domestic partnerships, primarily to expand civil rights for lesbian and gay people in the absence of their right to marriage. While his bill did not pass it helped move to the forefront the effort to achieve equal rights for gays and lesbians. New York State adopted the same-sex marriage law in 2011.

As a Democrat serving in the minority party his entire legislative career, Leichter described his strategy as “raising issues”, which he accomplished through aggressive debate on the Senate floor, extensive research reports, and frequent news conferences in the Senate lobby and on the steps of New York City Hall. His districts covered portions of the western sides of Manhattan and the Bronx. His stands and independence resulted in the Democratic and Republican leadership twice reapportioning him so his home was outside his district. Both times he ran in newly structured districts to retain his seat.

Leichter announced his retirement from the Senate in 1998 at age 67, and was succeeded by Eric Schneiderman, who went on to be elected as New York State Attorney General in 2010.

In 2000 he was nominated by President Bill Clinton as a Director of the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB), which was the regulator of the Home Loan Bank System. Leichter began his service in August 2000 with a recess appointment from the President. He was then re-nominated by President George W. Bush and confirmed by the Senate. Leichter served until July 2006 when his term expired.

Leichter was nominated in 2009 by Governor David Paterson to serve on New York State’s Banking Board. He was confirmed by the Senate and served as a member until its elimination in 2011.

Leichter was a practicing attorney for 50 years, specializing in commercial litigation and in representing foreign clients. Among others, he represented Brazilian and Mexican Banks. He was associated with various law firms, including Wachtell Manheim & Grouf and until his service on the Federal Housing Finance Board with Walter Conston, Alexander & Green (now part of Alston & Bird).

Leichter is a Director of the Hudson River Park Trust Board, which is constructing a park along the Hudson River in Manhattan goalkeeper glove websites, New York.

Leichter appears in the 2012 film Here One Day, directed by daughter Kathy Leichter, about the 1995 suicide of Leichter’s wife and Kathy’s mother Nina.

Bonaventura Lamacchia

Bonaventura Lamacchia (Cosenza, 19 febbraio 1953) è un politico e imprenditore italiano.

Presidente del Cosenza Calcio dal 1993 al 1995, nel 1994 inizia l’attività politica all’interno del Patto Segni.

In occasione delle elezioni politiche del 1994 best goalkeeper glove, si candida al Senato nel collegio di Cosenza: Lamacchia ottiene il 23,5% dei voti, ma non risulta eletto. Nel 1996 riesce invece ad ottenere il seggio alla Camera dei deputati all’interno di Rinnovamento Italiano.

Dal 17 novembre 1998 è stato Componente della Commissione Parlamentare Antimafia.

Successivamente, nel novembre 1999, aderisce all’Unione per la Repubblica; infine, nel dicembre 1999, passa all’Udeur.

In occasione delle elezioni europee del 2004 si candida per l’Udeur nella circoscrizione meridionale: Lamacchia ottiene circa ottomila preferenze e non risulta eletto.

Nel dicembre 2010 è stato arrestato dalla squadra mobile di Cosenza per presunta violenza privata: secondo l’inchiesta, Lamacchia sarebbe affiliato alla cosca di Michele Bruni, ma e l’ex parlamentare è stato prosciolto.

Sebbene gli indizi a suo carico fossero giudicati inconsistenti fin dall’inizio, l’ex parlamentare è costretto a subire novanta giorni di custodia cautelare in carcere. Per solidarietà a quello che gli stava accadendo agli inizi del 2011 è stato fondato un comitato a sostegno del loro ex sindaco dagli abitanti del suo comune di nascita.

L’ex parlamentare era già stato tratto in arresto in passato perché accusato di attività illecite: in seguito al patteggiamento della pena, era stato condannato a due anni e mezzo di carcere per bancarotta fraudolenta e tentata truffa waist bottle holder.

Attualmente, a causa della disavventura giudiziaria subita, Bonaventura Lamacchia sta portando avanti una campagna per difendere i cittadini dall’ toothpaste dispenser singapore. Ora è un uomo libero e risulta incensurato.

2011 United Nations Climate Change Conference

The 2011 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP17) was held in Durban, South Africa, from 28 November to 11 December 2011 to establish a new treaty to limit carbon emissions.

A treaty was not established, but the conference agreed to establish a legally binding deal comprising all countries by 2015, which was to take effect in 2020. There was also progress regarding the creation of a Green Climate Fund for which a management framework was adopted. The fund is to distribute US$100 billion per year to help poor countries adapt to climate impacts.

While the president of the conference, Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, declared it a success, scientists and environmental groups warned that the deal was not sufficient to avoid global warming beyond 2 °C as more urgent action is needed.

The conference was officially referred to as the 17th session of the Conference of the Parties (COP 17) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the 7th session of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties (CMP 7) to the Kyoto Protocol. In addition, the two permanent subsidiary bodies of the UNFCCC – the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) and the Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI) – were likely to hold their 35th sessions. The 2010 United Nations Climate Change Conference extended the mandates of the two temporary subsidiary bodies – the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP) and the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (AWG-LCA) – so they were expected to meet as well.

A primary focus of the conference was to secure a global climate agreement as the Kyoto Protocol’s first commitment period (2008–2012) was about to end. It was also expected to focus on “finalising at least some of the Cancun Agreements”, reached at the 2010 Conference, such as “co-operation on clean technology”, as well as “forest protection, adaptation to climate impacts, and finance – the promised transfer of funds from rich countries to poor in order to help them protect forests, adapt to climate impacts, and “green” their economies”.

A month before the Conference began, the BBC highlighted two contentious proposals which had been submitted – one by Russia, the other by Papua New Guinea, both aiming to amend the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Russia’s proposal would bring about a “periodic review” whereby countries currently categorised as “poor” could be recategorised as “rich”, and thus obliged to shoulder greater obligations in the combat against climate change. BBC Environment correspondent Richard Black commented that the proposal would be “provocative and explosive, if Russia pushes it”, because potentially affected countries, such as China and Brazil, would “push back very strongly”. Papua New Guinea’s proposal, submitted by Ambassador Kevin Conrad with the support of Mexico, would introduce a “last resort” mechanism to break any deadlocks in climate change negotiations through a three-quarters majority vote, thus clarifying the decision-making process under the Convention. Describing the proposal as “intriguing”, Black noted that although it would theoretically enable developing countries to use their numerical superiority to adopt any kind of world-wide binding obligation, in practical terms they would still need the approval of rich countries to secure funding.

Xie Zhenhua, head of the Chinese delegation, stated that China was willing to make binding commitments to limited greenhouse gases in 2020 if they appropriately took into account historical contributions of greenhouse gases by developed countries such as the United States and European states and sustainable economic needs of developing countries such as China and India.

Xie said that he was concerned about the reluctance of developed nations to reduce their own greenhouse gas emissions. He called on developed countries to provide financial and technical aid to help developing nations fight against and cope with the effects of climate change.

India’s representative at the conference, Jayanthi Natarajan stated that India “will not be intimidated. There is an attempt to shift the blame to developing countries. We do not accept that. Please do not hold us hostage. And please do not take our agreement to be weakness.” Natarajan responded to European Union Climate Commissioner Connie Hedegaard, saying that:

We have shown more flexibility than virtually any other country. But equity is the centrepiece, it cannot be shifted. This is not about India. Does fighting climate change mean we have to give up on equity? We have agreed to protocol and legal instrument. What’s the problem in having one more option? India will never be intimidated by any threat or any kind of pressure. What’s this legal instrument? How do I give a blank cheque? We’re talking of livelihoods and sustainability here. I’m not accusing anybody, but there are efforts to shift the (climate) problem to countries that have not contributed to it. If that is done, we’re willing to reopen the entire Durban Package. We did not issue a threat. But are we being made into a scapegoat? Please don’t hold us hostage.

Bruce Campbell, Director of the CGIAR research program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), said it was astonishing that agriculture, one of the worst emitters of greenhouse gases, remained excluded from global agreements on climate change. “Leading agricultural groups, from farmers and researchers to policymakers and development organisations, have all come together to call on COP17 negotiators to address the need for a Work Programme on agriculture,” Campbell said. “Now, it is up to negotiators to heed our joint call-to-action and allow agriculture to play its part in building resilience amongst vulnerable populations, helping farmers adapt to more unpredictable and extreme weather conditions and mitigating future climate change.”

Nnimmo Bassey, Chair of Friends of the Earth International, said “delaying real action until 2020 is a crime of global proportions … An increase in global temperatures of 4 degrees Celsius, permitted under this plan, is a death sentence for Africa, Small Island States, and the poor and vulnerable worldwide. This summit has amplified climate apartheid, whereby the richest 1% of the world have decided that it is acceptable to sacrifice the 99%.”

Greenpeace issued a statement calling on conference participants to ensure a peak in global emissions by 2015, continue the Kyoto Protocol and provide a mandate for a comprehensive legally binding instrument, deliver climate finance and set up a framework for protecting forests in developing countries.

Anjali Appadurai, a college student at College of the Atlantic in Maine and a member of the Youth Delegation, delivered a succinct speech that summed up the science regarding global warming and the failure of the UNFCCC negotiations to rein in climate change, demanding the UN “Get it done!”

After two weeks of negotiations a deal was reached only on the last day, Sunday 11 December, after a 60-hour marathon negotiation session. Negotiators agreed to be part of a legally binding treaty to address global warming. The terms of the future treaty are to be defined by 2015 and become effective in 2020. The agreement, referred to as the “Durban Platform for Enhanced Action”, was notable in that for the first time it included developing countries such as China and India, as well as the US which had refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol.

The agreement entailed the continuation of the Kyoto Protocol in the interim, although only some countries including members of the EU were indicated as likely to commit.

The terms of the Durban Platform were ultimately met following the successful negotiation of the Paris Agreement at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris, France.

The conference led to agreement on a management framework for a future Green Climate Fund. The fund is to distribute US$100bn per year to help poor countries adapt to climate impacts.

After the conference concluded, Michael Jacobs of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment in London, said: “The agreement here has not in itself taken us off the 4 °C path we are on… But by forcing countries for the first time to admit that their current policies are inadequate and must be strengthened by 2015, it has snatched 2 °C from the jaws of impossibility. At the same time it has re-established the principle that climate change should be tackled through international law, not national, voluntarism.”

Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change said: “I salute the countries who made this agreement. They have all laid aside some cherished objectives of their own to meet a common purpose, a long-term solution to climate change.”

Kumi Naidoo of Greenpeace International said: “Right now the global climate regime amounts to nothing more than a voluntary deal that’s put off for a decade uk football shop. This could take us over the 2 °C threshold where we pass from danger to potential catastrophe.”

U.S. Senator Jim Inhofe, who opposes government energy regulations such as cap-and-trade and has called man-made climate change a hoax, cheered what he called the setting aside of “any remote possibility of a UN global warming treaty” and described the conference outcome as “the complete collapse of the global warming movement and the failure of the Kyoto process”. Inhofe said that the message from Washington best goalkeeper glove, including from President Obama and the Democratic leadership of the U.S. Senate, to the delegates of the conference was that they are being ignored.

German media criticised the outcome as “almost useless”, saying the pledges are vague and the timeline is slow, the main merit being that the talks have been kept alive.

Abbès Mohsen

Abbès Mohsen (born 25 October 1945) is a Tunisian politician.

Between 2008 and 2011 he was a member of his country’s ruling Democratic Constitutional Rally (RCD / Rassemblement constitutionnel démocratique) (political party) Central Committee. He has also served, between 2000 and 2010, as the Mayor of Tunis.

Since the Tunisian Revolution of 2010/2011 Mohsen has attempted to continue with his public career, although membership of the Tunis political establishment under the previous regime has given rise to some political hostility.

Abbès Mohsen was born into a leading Tunisian family of Cherif provenance

United States Home JOHNSON 23 Jerseys

United States Home JOHNSON 23 Jerseys

BUY NOW

$266.58
$31.99

, which has also provided a line of imams to Al-Zaytuna Mosque. He is son to Zine el-Abidine Mohsen, Qaid-governor and himself son of Grand Imam Mahmoud Mohsen and of Zohra, daughter of Habib Djellouli&nbsp how do i tenderize meat;(fr), a leading politician in Tunisia during the middle years of the twentieh century.

He obtained his Baccalauréat at the Lycée Francais de Mutuelleville (as it was then known). He is a qualified lawyer and an alumnus of the Tunisian ENA (École nationale d’administration). At the age of just 30 he became the first governor of Bizerte and then, in 1976, the youngest ever governor of Nabeul (le Cap Bon).

Mohsen became governor-president for the important Tunis district in 1978. Two years later he was appointed Special Advisor to the First Minister. In 1981 he was appointed head of the Tunisian Hotels and Tourism association. In 1983 he became Director General for Local Collectives at the Tunisian Interior Ministry and then in 1986, for a second stint, governor-president for the Tunis district.

During the later 1980s his career increasingly took him into national politics. He was appointed Director General of Protocol to the President in 1988 and Project Leader for the Interior Ministry the following year, responsible for conferences at the ENA between 1989 and 1992. In 1992 he was sent to Yemen as his country’s ambassador, returning best goalkeeper glove, after three years in 1995. He now became permanent secretary to the country’s ruling Democratic Constitutional Rally (RCD party / Rassemblement constitutionnel démocratique), a position he retained till 1997 when he accepted a post as the Tunisian ambassador to Brazil.

In 2000 he was appointed Mayor of Tunis by decree: he was reappointed to the post in May 2005 on the basis of municipal elections. During this period he became secretary general of the International Association of Francophone Mayors (fr). At the turbulent RCD Party Congress in July/August 2008 he became a member of the Party Central Committee. On 11 January 2010 the president sacked Mohsen as mayor of Tunis and he was replaced by Mohamed Béji Ben Mami (fr) who was already a member of the city council. The official Tunis Africa Press agency (fr) report gave no explanation for the sacking, but press speculation elsewhere indicated that it resulted from a refusal by Mohsen to reply to journalists from the Tuinisian Channel 7 television programme El Hak Maâk who had asked about a litigation involving municipal service provision battery operated lint remover.

Abbès Mohsen received a further ambassadorial appointment, this time as theTunisian ambassador to the Netherlands, on 27 October 2010.

On 28 August 2014 his name was at the top of a unified candidate list issued by the Destourian Movement and the National Destourian Initiative – effectively an update and relaunch by elements of the old centrist RCD party – to contest First electoral district of Tunis in the Legislative election of October 2014. The former Destourians came ninth in the election, with a vote share that entitled them to three seats in the national legislative assembly.

Abbès Mohsen has received numerous awards and honours during his career. These include the Order of Independence and the Order of the Republic. Beyond Tunisia his various awards include the Grand Cross of the order of Brasilia and the Grand Cross of the Order of Rio Branco. He is a commander of the Legion of Honour and of the Order of Merit in Italy.